Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 12:45:24 +0000 From: Nik Clayton <nik@freebsd.org> To: Udo Erdelhoff <ue@nathan.ruhr.de> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Translators: Need feedback on FAQ reorganization Message-ID: <20010313124524.B2130@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> In-Reply-To: <20010313002953.I77178@nathan.ruhr.de>; from ue@nathan.ruhr.de on Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:29:53AM %2B0100 References: <20010311125040.E31751@holly.calldei.com> <20010312003518.A77178@nathan.ruhr.de> <20010312093709.B3114@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <20010312212209.G77178@nathan.ruhr.de> <20010312214725.B74204@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <20010313002953.I77178@nathan.ruhr.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--E39vaYmALEf/7YXx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:29:53AM +0100, Udo Erdelhoff wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:47:25PM +0000, Nik Clayton wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:22:09PM +0100, Udo Erdelhoff wrote: > > >=20 > > > yes, it does. The three people who are listed in the first commit mes= sage > > > on freefall aren't committers and a local repository was the only way= to > > > get the ball rolling.=20 > >=20 > > Do they want to be committers now? If you guys trust them not to screw > > up then that's good enough for me. >=20 > I can't speak for Dirk and Robert. I don't care either way. Would it make your life easier? I notice a couple of infrastructure-like PRs from you in the PR database, which you could do. > > I think that's a bad thing. >=20 > It may be but I was way past the point of caring about that. I have a very > finite of free time on my hands=20 As do we all. > and if I spend that time to improve the > German translation of the FAQ (or doing other things for the FGDP), I can > rely on the fact that other people will profit from my work. >=20 > On the other hand, my experiences with the international FDP are a rather > different story.=20 I'm sorry? I've just reviewed all the messages I have from you in my -doc archive, and I don't see what's caused you to come to this conclusion. As far as I can tell, the only thing we've disagreed on is how to handle the bibliographic stuff. That discussion petered out because you wanted a solution that worked for you immediately, and I wanted something that was more in keeping with the philosophy behind the markup. At the time, I had no examples to demonstrate what I was talking about. Since this is now somewhat closer to implementation than it was last time, I think it's appropriate to discuss it in more detail now. N --=20 FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://www.freebsd.org/ FreeBSD Documentation Project http://www.freebsd.org/docproj/ --- 15B8 3FFC DDB4 34B0 AA5F 94B7 93A8 0764 2C37 E375 --- --E39vaYmALEf/7YXx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjquFmMACgkQk6gHZCw343XUeACfZDNJdmVPoRV4OMQd3WuROWPT zfMAn2ORZRXOrdcqB+YCyM2ckHFHllwd =OCRI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --E39vaYmALEf/7YXx-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010313124524.B2130>