Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:09:58 +0100
From:      Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk>
To:        Eric Parusel <lists@globalrelay.net>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: The FreeBSD core team needs your help
Message-ID:  <20010612120958.G10614@tao.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <004001c0f030$36a0d3e0$0600020a@frontend>; from lists@globalrelay.net on Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 08:32:23AM -0700
References:  <20010608134705.19635.qmail@web14701.mail.yahoo.com> <004001c0f030$36a0d3e0$0600020a@frontend>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--NY6JkbSqL3W9mApi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 08:32:23AM -0700, Eric Parusel wrote:
> > > A journalling FS for those people who just hate waiting for a
> couple
> > > of
> > > TB of slow disks to fsck?
> >
> > Does ReiserFS work with FreeBSD?
>=20
> >From what I've read, XFS is quite good as well....  (Whether or not it
> could ever work with *BSD, I don't know)

Apparently XFS would run better on FreeBSD than on Linux, from what
Adrian told me.  This is because linux apparently channels all I/O
through 512k buffers whereas XFS uses larger buffers to get it's speed.
FreeBSD's buffer cache doesn't have the same limitations that Linux's
does.

Joe

--NY6JkbSqL3W9mApi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjsl+IUACgkQXVIcjOaxUBZbWACgmFzsQg4JELUtWuqvWY0uqvUM
Uc8AoOqJn3/eNTOwbCbOww6YB7YmWQJb
=cug6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--NY6JkbSqL3W9mApi--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010612120958.G10614>