Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 22:34:25 -0500 From: Zvezdan Petkovic <zvezdan@CS.WM.EDU> To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Portupgrade Utility Message-ID: <20020112223425.A901@dali.cs.wm.edu> In-Reply-To: <000701c19ba7$c1c01800$0300a8c0@max>; from willythemax@yahoo.it on Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 09:28:00PM %2B0100 References: <3C38AFF2.5020708@unios.dhs.org> <20020106213531.GE19117@gw.tex.bogus> <3C4083F4.9000900@unios.dhs.org> <20020112151622.H40697@hal9000.halplant.com> <000701c19ba7$c1c01800$0300a8c0@max>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 09:28:00PM +0100, Massimiliano Stucchi wrote: > Anyway, if not portupgrade, why not include cvsup in the base system, as I > think we're talking about a really necessary utility ? > Allow me to disagree. CVS is absolutely necessary. CVSup is not. It's merely a convenience. One can do source and port updates using cvs only. -- Zvezdan Petkovic <zvezdan@cs.wm.edu> http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020112223425.A901>