Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 18:50:51 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Doug Hardie <bc979@lafn.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 5.1 for production systems Message-ID: <20030621015051.GA62479@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <0DAFD736-A382-11D7-BA30-000393681B06@lafn.org> References: <20020916211801.GA32190@fuzzilicious.fuzzynerd.com> <0DAFD736-A382-11D7-BA30-000393681B06@lafn.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 05:48:20PM -0700, Doug Hardie wrote: > Some time ago there was an announcement that people should not use 5.0=20 > for critical production systems. Now that 5.1 is available, what is=20 > the consesous on it? Should it be used for critical production systems= =20 > yet? If you're worried and don't need any of the new features, wait until 5.x-STABLE. Kris --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+87n7Wry0BWjoQKURAtSdAJ9hRqr/q85Yv64BNqggZ59vmEtUXACePKvf iY6eJPd96hVyadBn1gdWcLQ= =P9j+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030621015051.GA62479>