Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 10 Nov 2004 20:21:18 +0300
From:      Patrick Okui <pokui@psg.com>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Cc:        Christian Meutes <christian.meutes@de.clara.net>
Subject:   Re: Pam Authorization Problem
Message-ID:  <200411102021.18553.pokui@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <2627048885E8BF7F8DCDCFD2@jesk.int.de.clara.net>
References:  <2627048885E8BF7F8DCDCFD2@jesk.int.de.clara.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 10 November 2004 20:13, Christian Meutes wrote:
> I recognized a strange behavior of PAM. My Plan was to do Authorization
> through pam_unix.so and pam_ldap.so
> I have the following configuration for this:
> ---
> account         required        pam_login_access.so
> account         sufficient        /usr/local/lib/pam_ldap.so
> account         required        pam_unix.so
> ---
>
> when the user neither exist in ldap nor in /etc/passwd then the
> auhtorization is nevertheless successful... this behavior isnt what i

huh? as in a user that more or less does *not* exist on your system can log 
in? do you have any other authentication modules that the system falls to?

> expected.
>
> i want to do authorization through pam_ldap.so and pam_unix.so
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200411102021.18553.pokui>