Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 00:14:35 +0200 From: Bjarne Wichmann Petersen <freebsd.nospam@mekanix.dk> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de>, Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (Re: Lifetime of FreeBSD branches) Message-ID: <200505260014.37054.freebsd.nospam@mekanix.dk> In-Reply-To: <20050525214555.GA41695@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <3248.172.16.0.199.1116876092.squirrel@172.16.0.1> <200505252342.01938.freebsd.nospam@mekanix.dk> <20050525214555.GA41695@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 25 May 2005 23:45, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 11:42:01PM +0200, Bjarne Wichmann Petersen wrote: > > I've had PREEMTION enabled in 5-STABLE for at couple of month and had the > > opposite experience. Eg. when clicking on a file in a fileselector (I'm > > using KDE) it would take 2-3 seconds before the file got highlighted. > > After disabling PREEMTION again responsetime seems to have improved. > Are you running 5.4-RELEASE or later? Later (5.4-STABLE). Hmm... did a little testing. Sometimes I *still* get "long" responsetimes with PREEMPTION disabled in a seemingly random order. Bjarne
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200505260014.37054.freebsd.nospam>