Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 12:35:18 -0400 (EDT) From: John Von Essen <john@essenz.com> To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Negative Review of FreeBSD 5.4 Message-ID: <20050602123010.N4511@beck.quonix.net> In-Reply-To: <20050602091600.Q20286@Osgiliath.home.lan> References: <20050602091600.Q20286@Osgiliath.home.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>From bottom of page: Market: Low-end Web and Email servers, ... What the hell is that supposed to mean? Me personally, I have no sympathy for people who struggle to get FreeBSD to perform on bleeding edge hardware (new fancy SATA controllers, weird next generation AMD motherboards) >From a server environment, Intel platform (P4 and Xeon) with SCSI (RAID and non-RAID), you'll never experience this kind of trouble. -john On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Neal E. Westfall wrote: > Anybody have any thoughts on this review? > > http://os.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=05/05/24/2153257&tid=8 > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-advocacy-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050602123010.N4511>