Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 10 May 2006 18:31:20 -0400
From:      "J.R. Oldroyd" <fbsd@opal.com>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Regression: apm no longer works between 6.1-RC1 and 6.1-STABLE 2006/05/09
Message-ID:  <20060510223120.GB7530@linwhf.opal.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I have just taken the system on a Sony Vaio PCG-Z505SX laptop from
6.1-RC1 (2006/03/23) to 6.1-STABLE (2006/05/09) using a cvsup update
and full buildworld/buildkernel rebuild, while keeping the same
kernel config.

On booting the new system, apm no longer works.  Now, acpi never
work on this hardware anyway, but apm always worked fine.  On the
6.1-STABLE kernel, it doesn't probe or load properly at boot time.
For reasons I no longer recall, "device apm" is configured in this
kernel, rather than loading it as a module, and this has been fine
for years, in fact, since back in the 5.x days and for several 6.0
kernels as well as 6.1-RC1.

Here's the pertinent boot info:


FreeBSD 6.1-RC1 (2006/03/23):

real memory  = 134152192 (127 MB)
avail memory = 121733120 (116 MB)
ACPI disabled by blacklist.  Contact your BIOS vendor.
npx0: [FAST]
npx0: <math processor> on motherboard
npx0: INT 16 interface
cpu0 on motherboard
apm0: <APM BIOS> on motherboard
apm0: found APM BIOS v1.2, connected at v1.2
pcib0: <Intel 82443BX host to PCI bridge (AGP disabled)> pcibus 0 on motherboard
pir0: <PCI Interrupt Routing Table: 7 Entries> on motherboard


FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE (2006/05/09):

real memory  = 134152192 (127 MB)
avail memory = 121733120 (116 MB)
ACPI disabled by blacklist.  Contact your BIOS vendor.
cpu0 on motherboard
apm: Other PM system enabled.
pcib0: <Intel 82443BX host to PCI bridge (AGP disabled)> pcibus 0 on motherboard
pir0: <PCI Interrupt Routing Table: 7 Entries> on motherboard


On 6.1-STABLE, the /dev/apm device is not created and so none of
the apm tools work.

I don't see any changes to any of the apm code (in the last year
or so, actually), so this is presumably due to a change at a lower
level?

Any thoughts?
	-jr



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060510223120.GB7530>