Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 03:41:19 +0000 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@hub.freebsd.org> To: Peter Losher <Peter_Losher@isc.org> Cc: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvsup tags for architectures? Message-ID: <20071018034119.GA54778@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4716D2B7.9040300@isc.org> References: <4716D2B7.9040300@isc.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 08:27:51PM -0700, Peter Losher wrote: > BTW - can 5.4 ISO's in general be moved to freebsd-archive (as well as > 4.11/alpha?) IMHO, it's time for all the above to go. If you look at http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portsuploadstatus.py, you'll see a survey of what packages the ftp*.freebsd.org sites are currently storing. (NB: ftp1.freebsd.org and ftp12.freebsd.org arbitrarily limit the number of results returned, which confuses my algorithm). "green" means "has the same stuff as ftp4" (I had to choose one site as canonical). (This survey doesn't count the 'release' packages.) A few sites are behind, but I don't know how to contact them. The sparc64-5 bits are sufficiently rotten as to not be worth mirroring (again IMHO). We don't have enough horsepower to keep 2 sparc64 trees timely. A sparc64-7 build is currently in progress. We have the horsepower to keep amd64[567] and i386[567] up-to-date ATM. For reference, the secteam support matrix: http://www.freebsd.org/security/index.html#supported-branches mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071018034119.GA54778>