Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 01:01:51 +0000 From: Frank Shute <frank@esperance-linux.co.uk> To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: freebsd-chat@freeBSD.org Subject: Re: why is it called /boot/beastie.4th ? Message-ID: <20080203010151.GA62332@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <863asaopbz.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <Pine.SOC.4.64.0802011055540.26188@libra.sfsu.edu> <200802012123.m11LNV3s061230@lurza.secnetix.de> <20080201225214.GA57322@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> <863asaopbz.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 01:28:48AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote: > > Frank Shute <frank@esperance-linux.co.uk> writes: > > Should be done by default IMO. Used to be until the religious maniacs > > started going on about devil worship and other such nonsense. > > No, it was removed because it was butt-ugly. ASCII art stopped being > cool twenty years ago. And the ascii Freebsd that it was replaced with is beautiful?! And cool?!! I like the ascii beastie and you've got no taste ;) If it were put to a vote, the beast would win by a country mile amongst those users with taste! -- Frank Contact info: http://www.esperance-linux.co.uk/misc/contact.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080203010151.GA62332>