Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:36:08 -0700 From: Charlie Kester <corky1951@comcast.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] New category proposal, i18n Message-ID: <20090623203608.GB15815@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <200906231506.05001.tabthorpe@freebsd.org> References: <200906181114.43935.tabthorpe@freebsd.org> <3f6a88120906230713kf44c826x928beea65adf6c0e@mail.gmail.com> <20090623175247.GA65395@wep4035.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> <200906231506.05001.tabthorpe@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue 23 Jun 2009 at 12:05:55 PDT Thomas Abthorpe wrote: > >Localization is a subset Internationalization, so the new category >becomes a catch all for both entities. If i18n is too cryptic or too alphanumeric, and internationalization is too long, why not go with "nls"?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090623203608.GB15815>