Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:42:19 +0100
From:      Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
To:        Gary Gatten <Ggatten@waddell.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Backtick versus $()
Message-ID:  <20110225004219.bfbbbd77.freebsd@edvax.de>
In-Reply-To: <21929_1298589484_4D66E72C_21929_309_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499BD35499F@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com>
References:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1102201027170.56885@wonkity.com> <4D61599E.4040008@gmail.com> <AANLkTinJKcy8NyFzW9=6yKEY%2BF_payQVM108_=B7Gyjr@mail.gmail.com> <loom.20110224T210222-768@post.gmane.org> <AANLkTinQ4MMwWq77k1t-SwqE%2BzPep6VCNS9AKdT_H08b@mail.gmail.com> <loom.20110224T214917-136@post.gmane.org> <AANLkTik88V5Bb2BWM0Kpv3rWfek9_%2BgjqmEt6UbsVjpS@mail.gmail.com> <loom.20110224T220407-811@post.gmane.org> <AANLkTikAB--0Hrw76cbdzgfmeJMPt_N7isaw%2Byn_-QMn@mail.gmail.com> <20110224234044.0df661c1.freebsd@edvax.de> <20110224225425.GB13490@guilt.hydra> <20110225001301.e4f6d95f.freebsd@edvax.de> <21929_1298589484_4D66E72C_21929_309_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499BD35499F@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:18:03 -0600, Gary Gatten <Ggatten@waddell.com> wrote:
> Everyone is wrong! "pfmsh" is the best at everything, period. 
> It does everything you can possibly think of today and tomorrow. 
> It doesn't require any upgrades, ever.  It's 100% secure. 
> It doesn't use any memory or other resources, $hit, it doesn't
> even need to be installed; it just "magically" works.
> 
> There you have it.

The standard reply to "is better" or "is the best" is
"I don't like" followed by any arbitrary attribute,
like "but I don't like the color" or "I don't like
the file names". :-)

Meanwhile, I've looked into mksh and found out that
giving it a standard prompt (user@host:path$) is not
very easy and involves copying two lines from the
manpage (search for PS1) into a config file. It's
not that you can use bash's prompt 1:1 (or csh's).
Completition and history behaviour is nice, better
than bash, in my opinion, and equal to csh (which I
prefer in this regards).

Oh "prefer" - it's all very individual, that's why the
system's default shell should be replaced by punched
cards. Everyone likes colorful punched cards. :-)



-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110225004219.bfbbbd77.freebsd>