Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 17:59:27 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger <pi@opsec.eu> To: marekrud@gmail.com Cc: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: biber missing Message-ID: <20150111165927.GB44537@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <86egr1p972.fsf@gmail.com> References: <86mw5ppmw7.fsf@gmail.com> <20150111120419.GZ44537@home.opsec.eu> <20150111120659.GA44537@home.opsec.eu> <86egr1p972.fsf@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > If the documentation is present texlive-docs, does it mean that Biber is > missing from one of the texlive packages? Probably, yes. > Or should it get a port on its own? There's an old (2012) discussion at https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2012-May/075180.html which suggests that this should be done, yes. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150111165927.GB44537>