Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 11 Jan 2017 21:05:07 +0000
From:      Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>
To:        "Russell L. Carter" <rcarter@pinyon.org>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: spamassassin not lethal anymore
Message-ID:  <20170111210507.2dc39818c6e9d439abb21ee6@sohara.org>
In-Reply-To: <2463a238-e10f-e81d-cab1-5a7eaf774590@pinyon.org>
References:  <2463a238-e10f-e81d-cab1-5a7eaf774590@pinyon.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 13:45:47 -0700
"Russell L. Carter" <rcarter@pinyon.org> wrote:

> Howdy,
> 
> I've been happy using postfix+spamassassin for a long long
> time, and it's always worked great.  However in the last
> few weeks it's not been scoring spam high enough, and in the
> last 10 days the spam is getting through in a torrent.   I
> see a lot of scores in the 1-2 range, for what is obviously
> spam.  I'm not really comfortable setting the threshold to
> 1, say.

	I had a similar setup until recently, and like you I've been seeing
spam getting through more and more despite regular running of sa-update,
most of it botnet sourced. I've pretty much eliminated it now by a
combination of installing dcc and razor plugins to spamassassin (reduced
the spam getting through by 70% or so) and adding a backup MX with a free
service that only accepts messages to relay when the primary is down (it's
amazing how much spam stopped coming in when I did that).

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170111210507.2dc39818c6e9d439abb21ee6>