Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 01 May 2000 01:26:13 -0400
From:      Ted Sikora <tsikora@home.com>
To:        Kenneth Wayne Culver <culverk@wam.umd.edu>, "current@FreeBSD.ORG" <current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: high CPU usage by xmms
Message-ID:  <390D1575.DA3F4C01@home.com>
References:  <Pine.GSO.4.21.0004302323270.8459-100000@rac8.wam.umd.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
> 
> Hmm, I don't know then, I'm using that ViBRA 16X which seems to cause
> problems a lot.
> 
> > 
> On Sun, 30 Apr 2000, Ted Sikora wrote:
> 
> > Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
> > >
> > > I guess it depends on your soundcard, I'm getting the behavior I'm getting
> > > with a ViBRA 16X and a kernel as of this morning. This didn't start
> > > happening until about 4 days ago with a -CURRENT kernel. Maybe you have an
> > > older -CURRENT.
> > >
> > >
> > I did a make build/installworld and kernel this afternoon after I
> > cvsup'd(current). I have an original non-pnp SB16.
> > (Best sounding sound card on the market IMOP)
> >

The VibraX used to be the card everyone recommended to stay away from.
It's not full-duplex. Early on it was hard writing for it (mostly due to
lack of specs and noise problems). It seems most problems have been
solved now. Like someone mentioned already
I think it's a 4.0 problem. Xmms worked perfectly under 3.4 for 
me too. The eq problem appeared after the upgrades.

--
Ted Sikora
Jtl Development Group 
tsikora@powerusersbbs.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?390D1575.DA3F4C01>