Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 17:13:59 -0300 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <daniel.sobral@tcoip.com.br> To: janb@cs.utep.edu Cc: Stefan Molnar <stefan@csudsu.com>, Marek Gorka <marek.gorka@tpi.pl>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.3 and 6G RAM Message-ID: <3B589107.2030609@tcoip.com.br> References: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0107181043440.25094-100000@gecko>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
janb@cs.utep.edu wrote: > I am interestied as to why this is. Is there a sound technical reason do > not support this, or was it merely the fact that there are not too many > machines that can take advantage of this anyway, and nobody got around to > do this? Yes, there is a good reason. It reduces overall performance. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) Daniel.Sobral@tcoip.com.br dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org capo@notorious.bsdconspiracy.net Talking much about oneself can also be a means to conceal oneself. -- Friedrich Nietzsche To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B589107.2030609>