Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 13:26:52 -0700 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com>, Adam Turoff <aturoff@isinet.com> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bsd vs. linux and NT chart Message-ID: <4.1.19990302132445.040f6d40@localhost> In-Reply-To: <Pine.HPP.3.96.990302151840.22218D-100000@hp9000.chc-chimes .com> References: <99Mar2.114516est.113920@pandora.isinet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well, as I understand it, FreeBSD 3.x is still not what's recommended for production applications. (I'm installing 2.2.8 on all of the productions machines I bring up.) So does this count? I still think it's an unfortunate development, though. Maybe it's possible to bring in more code from the Net or the CD after the boot, to keep the boot to one floppy. --Brett At 03:19 PM 3/2/99 -0500, Bill Fumerola wrote: >On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Adam Turoff wrote: > >> FreeBSD: ++ (can be done, single-floppy install) > >This is not true anymore. > >- bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - >- ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.1.19990302132445.040f6d40>