Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 05 Jan 2003 12:03:36 -0700
From:      Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
To:        Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@online.fr>, Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
Cc:        "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <grog@FreeBSD.org>, chat@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Bystander shot by a spam filter
Message-ID:  <4.3.2.7.2.20030105120224.029377d0@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20030105133439.GA55543@papagena.rockefeller.edu>
References:  <3E18073C.68182FE4@mindspring.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20030104201251.029387d0@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030104112015.026a5530@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030104201251.029387d0@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030104202908.03c3b100@localhost> <20030105073804.GA72674@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20030105074923.GA4956@papagena.rockefeller.edu> <3E18073C.68182FE4@mindspring.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 06:34 AM 1/5/2003, Rahul Siddharthan wrote:

>The point is, sparse matrix operations and LU decomposition are
>exactly the cases Brett is talking about.

Our primary interest wasn't sparse matrix operations. But we did
do LU decomposition, and with our code Intel beat GCC by a
substantial margin.

--Brett


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.2.7.2.20030105120224.029377d0>