Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:28:22 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: "Sam Fourman Jr." <sfourman@gmail.com> Cc: pcc@gmx.net, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, steve@ibctech.ca, sthaug@nethelp.no Subject: Re: Multiple default routes / Force external routing Message-ID: <49E57076.7040509@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <11167f520904141722r16b537a9o58497c9719fb6fc5@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090413.220932.74699777.sthaug@nethelp.no> <49E41755.8050701@elischer.org> <49E48799.1000300@ibctech.ca> <20090414.212318.41684722.sthaug@nethelp.no> <11167f520904141722r16b537a9o58497c9719fb6fc5@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:23 PM, <sthaug@nethelp.no> wrote: >>>> I think you are rather confused about what Multiple FIBs is.. >>>> All it is is teh ability to make a packet use a particular >>>> FIB on it's outgoing path. There is not such thing as an interface >>>> being "In" a FIB. All interfaces are still visible to the routing code >>>> by default, and The IP stack still knows about them.I think the IP >>>> stack set's the 'loopback' flag on a packet regardless of the FIB >>>> selected if teh dest is one of its own addresses. >>>> >>>> What you want is VIMAGE. > > is VIMAGE fully integrated into FreeBSD 8 CURRENT? (I believe this > answer is no) > also is VIMAGE expected to make it into FreeBSD 8? not fully but a lot of it is under way > > Maybe Someone will give a VIMAGE update at BSDCan this year I'm hoping the report will be "try this option in your kernel" but real life tends to make these plans variable. > > Sam Fourman Jr.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49E57076.7040509>