Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:04:35 -0400 From: Glen Barber <glen.j.barber@gmail.com> To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>, Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> Subject: Re: security/clamav: Segmentation fault when running clamav in a 32-bit jail on a 64-bit host Message-ID: <4C780C43.5010603@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20100827185837.GZ2396@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <4C77DB15.5010501@gmail.com> <20100827163310.GD67795@home.opsec.eu> <4C77EBF8.9020405@gmail.com> <20100827165423.GA32102@icarus.home.lan> <4C77F0A9.6030807@gmail.com> <20100827185837.GZ2396@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Kostik, On 8/27/10 2:58 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote: >> Of course. The new backtrace is here: http://gist.github.com/553734 > > I suspect that this was fixed in r210796/HEAD and r211138/RELENG_8. > I will check this out on a test machine. Thanks. >> >>> 2) Was the software rebuilt from source after the upgrade from i386 to >>> amd64, or are you expecting the software to work without any hitches >>> running on amd64 with lib32 (32-bit compatibility libaries)? The latter >>> is not always possible/the case. >>> >> >> clamav was rebuilt from ports. I previously went as far as downgrading >> to the previous version, to rule out something between 0.96.1 and >> 0.96.2; same results there. > > Was clamav rebuilt in the 32-bit jail ? At least your backtrace shows > 32-bit image being executed. > Yes, this is correct. Thanks again, -- Glen Barber
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C780C43.5010603>