Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:38:47 -0500 From: Rich <rincebrain@gmail.com> To: Andrew Snow <andrew@modulus.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Errors on a file on a zpool: How to remove? Message-ID: <5da0588e1001231638i349f8f17t297e970b08825441@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4B5B94B8.7070509@modulus.org> References: <5da0588e1001222223m773648am907267235bdcf882@mail.gmail.com> <ed91d4a81001230011t7aef2da8h3be13d2494c06550@mail.gmail.com> <5da0588e1001230014k1b8a32f8v42046497265429ed@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1001231519110.91898@ibyngvyr> <5da0588e1001231415t403f29ceq6e8dcd16edb4a28@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1001231733570.2160@ibyngvyr> <5da0588e1001231541l246769eao410c5ea6ccca0de4@mail.gmail.com> <A43CB93C-06D6-406D-A8C0-4E10E85661A2@gmail.com> <5da0588e1001231615t37c22575uedaae938be40f530@mail.gmail.com> <4B5B94B8.7070509@modulus.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'm not claiming that restoring data from backups is unreasonable, or that silent data corruption is better. I'm claiming that my inability to delete the corrupted data in order to restore from backups without nuking unaffected data or remaking the filesystem is unreasonable. - Rich On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Andrew Snow <andrew@modulus.org> wrote: > Rich wrote: >> >> I claim this is still Bad Behavior, and should be resolvable without >> doing something like that. > > I cannot agree that silent corruption (which would have happened with any > other filesystem) is preferable to what ZFS is doing here. > > You had bad RAM, and no redundancy in a huge RAID0, I think it would be > reasonable to have to restore from backups or recreate the data and not pin > blame on ZFS. > > > - Andrew > -- BOFH excuse #208: Your mail is being routed through Germany ... and they're censoring us.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5da0588e1001231638i349f8f17t297e970b08825441>