Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:00:06 -0500 From: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org> To: freebsd ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Subversion 1.3.0-rc2 Message-ID: <6364140F-2C30-489B-9B38-BFF503F66499@khera.org> In-Reply-To: <e2c462550511280549o5c102617x19a9c62c72347e23@mail.gmail.com> References: <e2c462550511280549o5c102617x19a9c62c72347e23@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 28, 2005, at 8:49 AM, Mischa Peters wrote: > It would also be nice to know why there is an RC in /usr/ports, and > why there isn't a subversion-devel tree. > Thanks to your earlier warning, I avoided upgrading subversion... I too also wonder about why stable port versions are replaced with pre-release software in ports. This seems like just a bad choice by the maintainer, but I'm not sure if it violates any policies of the ports system. Perhaps there should be some policy regarding stability of software.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6364140F-2C30-489B-9B38-BFF503F66499>