Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 12:09:07 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: "Jiawei Ye" <leafy7382@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Apple to adopt ULE scheduler in next version of OS/X? Message-ID: <863amqhsfw.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <c21e92e20807032248m7d7163a5qc765902af3e0ce04@mail.gmail.com> (Jiawei Ye's message of "Fri\, 4 Jul 2008 13\:48\:29 %2B0800") References: <c21e92e20807032248m7d7163a5qc765902af3e0ce04@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Jiawei Ye" <leafy7382@gmail.com> writes: > I came across this interesting piece of blog entry > > http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/os-x-snow-leopard-to-use-ule-scheduler/ > > Comments anyone? Short version: bullshit. The slightly longer version is that this is unfounded speculation - not even that, it's just a random blogger expressing a wish that Apple would do something which they most likely have no reason for or interest in doing. It also greatly exaggerates the benefits of ULE. It's good, but it's not a revolutionary breakthrough in computer science. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?863amqhsfw.fsf>