Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 19:32:06 +0900 From: "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@iDaemons.org> To: "."@babolo.ru Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/46854: ports/lang/ruby/files/patch-defines.h includes RCS ids Message-ID: <86znpo42xl.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> In-Reply-To: <1043541740.202494.9664.nullmailer@cicuta.babolo.ru> References: <863cng6bvr.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> <1043541740.202494.9664.nullmailer@cicuta.babolo.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Sun, 26 Jan 2003 03:42:20 +0300 (MSK),
"."@babolo.ru wrote:
> Using ports tree as is without changes is not
> the only model of use.
> Propagation tweaked tree via cvs
> can screw RCS Ids.
That is the misconfiguration. You are supposed to use the FreeBSD
version of CVS (or a compatible one) with a correct CVSROOT, or just
CVSup. Otherwise $FreeBSD$ tags are not properly expanded and other
problems could occur, like, well, patch conflicts.
> Yes you are free to not clean up diffs
> from unnecessary chunks if want.
You know, it is not good manners to modify a diff by hand. Suppose if
the RCS tag line were part of a big chunk. I could of course apply
the diff partly and then regenerate a patch, but note that that kinds
of irrelevant tasks can be too much to ask of a maintainer.
--
/
/__ __ Akinori.org / MUSHA.org
/ ) ) ) ) / FreeBSD.org / Ruby-lang.org
Akinori MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( @ iDaemons.org / and.or.jp
"It went right by me -- At the time it went over my head
I was looking out the window.. I should have looked at your face instead"
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86znpo42xl.wl>