Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 16 Oct 2010 06:22:40 -0700
From:      Rob Farmer <rfarmer@predatorlabs.net>
To:        =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com>
Cc:        User Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: libxul compilation problem
Message-ID:  <AANLkTim8SjtWG5XYp_PtFbPnG3zLbxsfvynHVswjC167@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikdutVjbVA6iOJzm3Q%2BNOLjsZmskyfyNzVfDhxi@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <AANLkTikzAUJSSTC9bDzSaWgUiM6TJjHgq4%2BaNOqXrSDP@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTik9kcWU4PWfSsZmObOTp_z8-mgb60z3EtFBrm7j@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikdutVjbVA6iOJzm3Q%2BNOLjsZmskyfyNzVfDhxi@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2010/10/16 Fernando Apestegu=EDa <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com>:
> I didn't run X or whatsoever. That's why I think I should have enough mem=
ory.
> In fact after getting that error, I rebooted so I could update the
> ports from a "fresh"
> running system (nothing cached or so). But even in that case, I'm getting=
 the
> same error.
>
> Any VM tuning I can try?

I'm not really knowledgeable about that kind of thing.

However, the port is marked MAKE_JOBS_SAFE which means that it will
try to run multiple compiler instances in parallel, to speed things up
if you have multiple CPUs/cores. You can try running with "make
-DDISABLE_MAKE_JOBS" to just run one at a time - maybe you have enough
memory for that but not multiple jobs at once?

--=20
Rob Farmer



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTim8SjtWG5XYp_PtFbPnG3zLbxsfvynHVswjC167>