Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 23:10:07 +0800 From: Doug Brewer <brewer.doug@gmail.com> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Chuck Burns <break19@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm Message-ID: <CAG0V13Q6vsodid6iRret=Jo7wxWPp5HfVj_JCOkEPB7Eimjs4w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Adrian Chadd wrote: On 9 November 2012 14:37, Chuck Burns <break19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Adrian. diskspace and cpu cycles are things I can spare, drop me a line > > outside of the ML and we can discuss particulars. "It's just a personal > > box.. on a residential internet service, I have an amd64 box with 600G free > > on my pool.. 8G ram.. and I have a smaller i386 box... 100G or so free, 512M > > ram.. just drop me a line.. > > Hi, > > Those I do have - I have access to all of the ref* boxes in the > cluster. I'm just typically hacking on this stuff on the train or at a > cafe, and I don't have a workflow setup for pushing out potential > diffs to build machines that have all the grunt/disk space for each > little change that I do. Wait wait wait. It makes me wonder if you get the patch tested well on the train or at a cafe before being committed. > I'm sorry about breaking things from time to time, but besides a small > handful of "what was I thinking?!" things, the build breaks are just > that - build breaks. They're easily fixed. I do not care how things are easily fixed. Remember, when Sam Leffler was the maintainer of ath and CAMBRIA board (it's an embedded device, right?), he had never broke the build. > Adrian BR, Doug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAG0V13Q6vsodid6iRret=Jo7wxWPp5HfVj_JCOkEPB7Eimjs4w>