Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 16:42:12 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com> To: Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Runaway process in -CURRENT Message-ID: <CAGwOe2Y1wFZSr0zEsugzPDoTA2b6oznG=ggZwfSTWoi5h173WA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAGwOe2awSX9Svh9Y-3Ew_PMY1=srHLD01CKfqDzeuXNMA3KS5g@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAGwOe2aCU7HigZJdx2YJCrDZsWUtRVApFzzvPTx%2BLE-AP_B4qA@mail.gmail.com> <71697463-4E52-4B46-B60B-00BDD87D8A2C@FreeBSD.org> <CAGwOe2aODZ3skAEVn9kF3ruKFQtQjFfUk_sa2_hJp99YYgnKsQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGwOe2bkkNye_B4OjG9e0p4Dnp3EbRyP0=vh6yhfHBQ_6r-7yQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGwOe2awSX9Svh9Y-3Ew_PMY1=srHLD01CKfqDzeuXNMA3KS5g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com> wrote: > > > El 24 ago. 2017 10:58, "Dimitry Andric" <dim@freebsd.org> escribi=C3=B3: > > On 23 Aug 2017, at 23:29, Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa > <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> cad/stepcode is reported as runaway in -CURRENT. > > Where is this report? > > > In the mail that was sent to me it says it's here: > > http://beefy11.nyi.freebsd.org/data/head-i386-default/p448504_s322776/log= s/stepcode-0.8_1.log > > But I can't access that url > Just for the record, I got another email. Log URL: http://beefy11.nyi.freebsd.org/data/head-i386-default/p448640_s322824/logs/= stepcode-0.8_1.log Last lines of the report are these: /stepcode-0.8/src/cldai -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/cad/stepcode/work/stepcode-0.8/src/cleditor -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/cad/stepcode/work/stepcode-0.8/src/clutils -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/cad/stepcode/work/stepcode-0.8/src/clstepcore -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/cad/stepcode/work/stepcode-0.8/src/base -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/cad/stepcode/work/stepcode-0.8/src/base/judy/src -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -pedantic -W -Wall -Wundef -Wfloat-equal -Wshadow -Winline -Wno-long-long -MD -MT schemas/sdai_wip210e3/CMakeFiles/sdai_wip210e3.dir/SdaiAP210_ELECTRONIC_ASS= EMBLY_INTERCONNECT_AND_PACKAGING_DESIGN_MIM_LF_unity_types.cc.o -MF schemas/sdai_wip210e3/CMakeFiles/sdai_wip210e3.dir/SdaiAP210_ELECTRONIC= _ASSEMBLY_INTERCONNECT_AND_PACKAGING_DESIGN _MIM_LF_unity_types.cc.o.d -o schemas/sdai_wip210e3/CMakeFiles/sdai_wip210e3.dir/SdaiAP210_ELECTRONIC_ASS= EMBLY_INTERCONNECT_AND_PACKAGING_DESIGN_MIM_LF_unity_types.cc.o -c schemas/sdai_wip210e3/SdaiAP210_ELECTRONIC_ASSEMBLY_INTERCONNECT_AND_PAC= KAGING_DESIGN_MIM_LF_unity_types.cc [411/421] /usr/bin/c++ -DSC_SDAI_UNITY_BUILD -Dsdai_wip210e3_EXPORTS -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/cad/stepcode/work/stepcode-0.8/include -Iinclude -Ischemas/sdai_wip210e3 -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/cad/stepcode/work/stepcode-0.8/src/cldai -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/cad/stepcode/work/stepcode-0.8/src/cleditor -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/cad/stepcode/work/stepcode-0.8/src/clutils -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/cad/stepcode/work/stepcode-0.8/src/clstepcore -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/cad/stepcode/work/stepcode-0.8/src/base -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/cad/stepcode/work/stepcode-0.8/src/base/judy/src -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -pedantic -W -Wall -Wundef -Wfloat-equal -Wshadow -Winline -Wno-long-long -MD -MT schemas/sdai_wip210e3/CMakeFiles/sdai_wip210e3.dir/SdaiAll.cc.o -MF schemas/sdai_wip210e3/CMakeFiles/sdai_wip210e3.dir/SdaiAll.cc.o.d -o schemas/sdai_wip210e3/CMakeFiles/sdai_wip210e3.dir/SdaiAll.cc.o -c schemas/sdai_wip210e3/SdaiAll.cc =3D=3D=3D=3D>> Killing runaway build after 7200 seconds with no output > > >> It seems to take >> forever to compile chemas/sdai_wip210e3/SdaiAll.cc. (it uses clang >> 5.0.0) > > Not for me, it compiles in slightly more than 2 seconds: > > clang-4.0.0 2.20 real 2.11 user 0.08 sys > clang-5.0.0-r311219 2.16 real 2.00 user 0.15 sys > > Are you using any special CFLAGS or CPUTYPE settings? > > > Sorry, I should have started this clearly: I'm receiving this reports fro= m > the project ports builders, but I can reproduce it in my machine with > -CURRENT in VirtualBox. > > No special flags on my setup though > > > >> What strikes me is that it compiles in my machine in about 10 minutes >> in 11.1 with clang4.0 > > Are you talking about the build of the entire port, or just that one > source file? The whole port takes quite a while to build, but it does > finish for me. > > > The entire port. > > > -Dimitry > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGwOe2Y1wFZSr0zEsugzPDoTA2b6oznG=ggZwfSTWoi5h173WA>