Date: Sat, 1 Feb 1997 18:12:34 +0100 (MET) From: Michael Reifenberger <root@totum.plaut.de> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: FreeBSD-current users <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>, Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de> Subject: Re: Good name for a dump(8) option? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970201180852.1050B-100000@totum.plaut.de> In-Reply-To: <19234.854813398@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 1 Feb 1997, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > Date: Sat, 01 Feb 1997 08:09:58 -0800 > From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> > To: Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de> > Cc: FreeBSD-current users <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG> > Subject: Re: Good name for a dump(8) option? > > > How to name this kid? Right now, i've picked key `e' (``end of > > medium'', ``enforce end-of-medium''), lacking a better idea. Are > > there any better suggestions that don't conflict with other existing > > keys? > > How about a tape length of -1 for the existing option? :-) Wouldn't the -1 cause YetAnotherOption? Should't it be a size of 0 instead? Bye! ---- Michael Reifenberger Plaut Software GmbH, R/3 Basis
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.970201180852.1050B-100000>