Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 Feb 2001 04:29:14 +1100 (EST)
From:      Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
To:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
Cc:        "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@kdm.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: sbufs in userland 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102270428520.19764-100000@besplex.bde.org>
In-Reply-To: <22345.983207314@critter>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

> In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102270336450.19382-100000@besplex.bde.org>, Bruce Ev
> ans writes:
> 
> >funopen() is more general than sbufs, so it is not quite as easy to use,
> >but I think it is easy enough.
> 
> But we don't have funopen(3) in the kernel...

See subject line.

Bruce


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0102270428520.19764-100000>