Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 4 Mar 2018 05:48:08 +0000
From:      Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>
To:        NAGY Andreas <Andreas.Nagy@frequentis.com>, "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   =?iso-8859-1?Q?Re:_NFS_4.1_RECLAIM=5FCOMPLETE_FS=A0failed_error_in_combin?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?ation_with_ESXi_client?=
Message-ID:  <YQBPR0101MB1042479407CAA253674BBAEBDDDB0@YQBPR0101MB1042.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <D890568E1D8DD044AA846C56245166780124AFB90E@vie196nt>
References:  <c5c624de-42bb-45cf-8cf0-b25be56e5f58@frequentis.com> <YQBPR0101MB1042DEF0825996764CBCA829DDC40@YQBPR0101MB1042.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>, <D890568E1D8DD044AA846C56245166780124AFB90E@vie196nt>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
NAGY Andreas wrote:
>Hi and thanks!
>
>First time using/needing a patch could you give me a short advise how to u=
se it >and for which version?
The only difference with kernel versions will be the line#s.
>So far I have made a fresh FreeBSD 11.1 RELEASE install as a VM on a ESXi =
host >updated the system and did a svn checkout http://svn.freebsd.org/base=
/release/11.1.0/
>
>Then tried to apply the patch in /usr/src/sys via patch < /tmp/reclaimcom2=
.patch
>
>Output was:
>Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
>The text leading up to this was:
>--------------------------
>|--- fs/nfsserver/nfs_nfsdserv.c.savrecl        2018-02-10 20:34:31.166445=
000 -0500
>|+++ fs/nfsserver/nfs_nfsdserv.c        2018-02-10 20:36:07.947490000 -050=
0
>--------------------------
>Patching file fs/nfsserver/nfs_nfsdserv.c using Plan A...
>No such line 4225 in input file, ignoring
>Hunk #1 succeeded at 4019 (offset -207 lines).
>done
Since it says "Hunk #1 succeeded...", I think it patched ok.
However, you can check by looking at nfsrvd_reclaimcomplete() in
sys/fs/nfsserver/nfs_nfsdserv.c.
Before the patch it would look like:
        if (*tl =3D=3D newnfs_true)
 	                nd->nd_repstat =3D NFSERR_NOTSUPP;
       else
 	                nd->nd_repstat =3D nfsrv_checkreclaimcomplete(nd);
whereas after being patched, it will look like:
      nd->nd_repstat =3D nfsrv_checkreclaimcomplete(nd);
       if (*tl =3D=3D newnfs_true)
                       nd->nd_repstat =3D 0;

rick
[stuff snipped]=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?YQBPR0101MB1042479407CAA253674BBAEBDDDB0>