Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 13:38:02 -0400 (EDT) From: doug <doug@fledge.watson.org> To: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" <steve@sohara.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: stable vs releng Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1808221335430.43782@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20180822154439.e388b74673a183639554ff5e@sohara.org> References: <010327df-876b-dc05-e9ed-130f3e8decb0@ifdnrg.com> <db8f5efe-4cb2-2d71-ea47-afbf7e4d7b4d@FreeBSD.org> <20180822154439.e388b74673a183639554ff5e@sohara.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 09:52:36 +0100 > Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > >> So no removal of drivers, no >> changes to ABIs, compatibility for 3rd party kernel modules across all >> the kernels in the branch etc. Some of that I think we're getting >> right, other bits we aren't doing so well with. > > <cough>nVidia</cough> > I do not understand. If the FreeBSD Desktop support model is a two story outhouse, XORG has always been on the top floor. At least that was my understanding. What am I missing?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.20.1808221335430.43782>