Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:46:30 +0100 From: Mischa Peters <mischa2023@gmail.com> To: freebsd ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Subversion 1.3.0-rc2 Message-ID: <e2c462550511290546m7e04901fif13e8c27d6eabd09@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1660867A-CB96-4324-8F06-DE25D233050E@khera.org> References: <e2c462550511280549o5c102617x19a9c62c72347e23@mail.gmail.com> <6364140F-2C30-489B-9B38-BFF503F66499@khera.org> <p06230905bfb0f4224bb6@128.113.24.47> <1660867A-CB96-4324-8F06-DE25D233050E@khera.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Vivek, > Hmmm... this leads me to then question whether Mischa is using BDB > backend of FSFS backend? Perhaps it is related to only one of them. > I know that once I upgraded subversion and the BDB version default > changed which caused my repos to be unusable until I did the BDB > upgrade procedure. I am not using FSFS. What is the BDB upgrade procedure? But I feel that someone made a real error in judgement on this, 1.3.0-rc2 should have never be allowed to replace the stable port of Subversion. And it would make sense to revert back to 1.2.3. Mischa
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e2c462550511290546m7e04901fif13e8c27d6eabd09>