Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 00:12:19 -0700 From: "Georg-W. Koltermann" <gwk@sgi.com> To: Gordon Tetlow <gordont@bluemtn.net> Cc: Erick Kinnee <erick@kinnee.net>, <freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Xircom RealPort Cardbus Ethernet 10/100+Modem 56 Message-ID: <lth3d9fxuwc.wl@hunter.munich.sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0106040222440.229-100000@sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com> References: <lthn17oj4c4.wl@hunter.munich.sgi.com> <Pine.BSF.4.33.0106040222440.229-100000@sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Mon, 4 Jun 2001 02:24:09 -0700 (PDT), Gordon Tetlow wrote: > > [...] > duplex mismatch? Cisco's are notorious for totally botching > autonegotiation. Other than that, I was under the impression that the CBEM > was the same as the RBEM just in a different packaging. Could be wrong > though. How would I be able to verify or even fix duplex mismatch? I tried both letting the card autoconfigure and setting it do 100 Mb full duplex with no apparent difference. The CISCO port is set to auto as my network support tells me. Should I have them set the CISCO to a fixed configuration? -- Regards, Georg. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Who in the world needs 2000 Windows? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?lth3d9fxuwc.wl>