Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 13:03:06 +0100 From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: removing distfiles? Message-ID: <20090528130306.2389ff89@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20090528122430.729c83a9@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <20090527224351.1e94029b@bobcat.edu> <20090527205610.GA22384@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20090528021346.54c91917@gumby.homeunix.com> <200905280749.12509.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <20090528122430.729c83a9@gumby.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 28 May 2009 12:24:30 +0100 RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 28 May 2009 07:49:12 +0200 > Mel Flynn <mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> wrote: > > > On Thursday 28 May 2009 03:13:46 RW wrote: > > > On Wed, 27 May 2009 22:56:10 +0200 > > > > > > Roland Smith <rsmith@xs4all.nl> wrote: > > > > Using e.g. 'portmaster --clean-distfiles-all' only removes those > > > > distfiles that do not belong to installed ports. > > > > > > I've not used it myself, but there is also a shell script called > > > distviper in bsdadminscripts which supports both of distclean's > > > modes without the ruby dependence. > > > > What ruby dependence in portmaster? He said portMASTER not > > portUPGRADE. > > I wrote: "supports both of distclean's modes without the ruby > dependence". > > Portmaster only supports one of the modes, distclean has a ruby > dependence. Sorry, that should have been portsclean not distclean.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090528130306.2389ff89>