Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 18:50:46 +0200 From: Mel Flynn <mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>, Johan Hendriks <Johan@double-l.nl> Subject: Re: Stable Mail Server And Web Mail Message-ID: <200905301850.47027.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905301804050.18381@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <1F9F36FCD9644D4683DADAF7DD62B412@john> <200905301753.38697.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905301804050.18381@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 30 May 2009 18:05:12 Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > Depends on your usage. I'd say for SMTP table lookups, MySQL can out > > perform PostgreSQL, unless one uses persistent connections (postfix > > proxy-map to be on topic). The reason for this is that the connection > > start up for MySQL has lower overhead then for PostgreSQL. > > for just quick searching of keys isn't just berkeley DB or maybe sqlite > the best. there will be no connecting at all. > > anyway sqlite is much more useful Only for single machine installs as I wouldn't recommend sqlite over NFS to share the database. The idea was to have one machine (or a replicated cluster) with a database and several mail servers getting their information from there. It's less about performance, more about a preference of how you want to manage your information. -- Mel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200905301850.47027.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.questions>