Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:39:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: Tim Robbins <tjr@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: X problems & 5.0... -RELEASE? Message-ID: <15788.14025.164591.788521@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <20021015123926.A76421@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> References: <15786.50928.826403.959175@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0210141053301.33371-100000@root.org> <15787.1474.824422.286474@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20021014200045.GA51207@xor.obsecurity.org> <20021015123926.A76421@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tim Robbins writes: > > It's worth noting that 4.7-RELEASE (w/ gcc 2.95.4) fails *more* test cases > than -CURRENT when -O is used to compile paranoia. Does 2.95.4 fail the same tests or different ones? Also, this program doesn't deal with signals, which is where I suspect the problem may be (ie, not the compiler but the kernel). If you understand this code, can you write and install signal handler for, say, sigusr1 and have another programe fire sigusr1's at the math test? Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15788.14025.164591.788521>