Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:10:42 -0400 From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Cc: Pete Carah <pete@altadena.net> Subject: Re: New compaq, new radeon id Message-ID: <200507211810.46474.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20050721091705.GA5341@users.altadena.net> References: <20050719100314.GA20584@users.altadena.net> <1121904708.4260.51.camel@leguin> <20050721091705.GA5341@users.altadena.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 21 July 2005 05:17 am, Pete Carah wrote: > At the moment, I tried xorg-server-snap. It is now recognized, and > X -probeonly appears to work but if I try to actually bring up > anything in a real X server the system waits about a second then > reboots. (hard to debug that kind of thing without an ICE :-( (and > I don't even know if ICE's exist for A64's) (and further, I > couldn't possibly afford one if they do exist :-(. > > Patching drm to recognize the chip is easy; I did this but only got > reboots whenever I tried X (note, however, that I get them without > this patch too). I don't know if just recognition is adequate or > there needs to be something else done too? Do you have /var/log/Xorg.0.log? If you do, can you send it to me? dmesg and your patch will be nice too. BTW, PCI-Express GART support is extremely experimental. > agp_amd64 has no ATI stuff mentioned in the source; only nvidia, > AMD, and via. Like I said in the previous e-mail, you won't need agp(4) at all. > I don't konw about agp_ati For now I'll wait somewhat patiently > (or look and see if agp_ati is remotely near. It isn't in my > source tree (cvsup HEAD as of early tonight)). That's not committed yet because we don't have any hardware to test. Jung-uk Kim > -- Pete
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200507211810.46474.jkim>