Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 20:39:58 +0200 From: Ivan Slavkov <ivan.slavkov@gmail.com> To: John Cagle <jcagle@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dual cpu question Message-ID: <60bb96a10903041039l6c8aa0ag72abd676124e127a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6863f0c90903041033mbbeacdt188752e9550b8f51@mail.gmail.com> References: <60bb96a10903040729t6f5603bl865b7047960830e7@mail.gmail.com> <6863f0c90903041033mbbeacdt188752e9550b8f51@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I haven't tried this yet. I will try. The main Idea is to have system with two good-working on FreeBSD. On this stage I cannot have it :( On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 8:33 PM, John Cagle <jcagle@gmail.com> wrote: > Why don't you rebuild the kernel without SMP support? Then it will only > use one CPU. > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Ivan Slavkov <ivan.slavkov@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hello all! >> Is there any software way to stop the second processor of two-processor >> (two >> quad core Xeon) proliant server with FreeBSD without romoving the >> proceesor >> in real? I have dead-locks with the two processors even in 7.1 with the >> new >> ULE schessuler. If I use one processor there are no problems. >> >> - Ivan >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-proliant >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-proliant-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?60bb96a10903041039l6c8aa0ag72abd676124e127a>