Date: Sun, 11 Feb 1996 01:21:59 +0100 (MET) From: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> To: imp@village.org (Warner Losh) Cc: mark@grondar.za, dima@FreeBSD.org, ache@astral.msk.su, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Kerberos @ freebsd.org? Message-ID: <199602110021.BAA03743@keltia.freenix.fr> In-Reply-To: <199602101759.KAA00992@rover.village.org> from Warner Losh at "Feb 10, 96 10:59:15 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It seems that Warner Losh said: > I have heard that different kerberoses use different port numbers and > that the encryption isn't completely standardized. The problem I have with Kerberos is that it does not -- to my knowledge -- encrypt everything from a telnet session. So trafic from any X11 program you start on the other side will not be encrypted. SSH does it _automatically_. When you think about it, if you were looking for a reason to use it over Kerberos, you just got it. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@keltia.frmug.fr.net FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 2.2-CURRENT #5: Sun Feb 4 03:11:17 MET 1996
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199602110021.BAA03743>