Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)


2006/freebsd-arch/20060910.freebsd-arch

Messages: 37, new messages first
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:14:19 2023

home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
  1. Sep  9 Vulpes Velox               Re: Is it Core 2 Duo compatible?
  2. Sep  9 Robert Watson              Re: Modularize kernel
  3. Sep  9 Howard Su                  Re: Modularize kernel
  4. Sep  9 Robert Watson              Re: Modularize kernel
  5. Sep  8 Peter Jeremy               Re: Moving ethernet VLAN tags into the mbuf packet header (from mtags)
  6. Sep  8 Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q? Re: Is it Core 2 Duo compatible?
  7. Sep  8 Jeremy Faulkner            Re: Is it Core 2 Duo compatible?
  8. Sep  8 Andre Oppermann            Re: Moving ethernet VLAN tags into the mbuf packet header (from mtags)
  9. Sep  8 Alexander Leidinger        Re: Modularize kernel
 10. Sep  8 Julian Elischer            Re: Modularize kernel
 11. Sep  8 M. Warner Losh             Re: Modularize kernel
 12. Sep  8 Howard Su                  Re: Modularize kernel
 13. Sep  8 Howard Su                  Re: Modularize kernel
 14. Sep  8 Andrew Thompson            Re: Moving ethernet VLAN tags into the mbuf packet header (from mtags)
 15. Sep  7 M. Warner Losh             Re: Modularize kernel
 16. Sep  7 Julian Elischer            Re: Moving ethernet VLAN tags into the mbuf packet header (from mtags)
 17. Sep  7 Martin Cracauer            Re: Is it Core 2 Duo compatible?
 18. Sep  7 Andre Oppermann            Moving ethernet VLAN tags into the mbuf packet header (from mtags)
 19. Sep  7 Thomas Lapeyre             Is it Core 2 Duo compatible?
 20. Sep  7 gnn@FreeBSD.org            Re: Modularize kernel


21. Sep 7 Howard Su Modularize kernel 22. Sep 6 Julian Elischer Re: USB changes 23. Sep 6 M. Warner Losh Re: USB changes 24. Sep 6 M. Warner Losh USB changes 25. Sep 5 John-Mark Gurney Re: bus_get_dma_tag now necessary for drivers using bus_dma 26. Sep 5 John-Mark Gurney Re: bus_get_dma_tag now necessary for drivers using bus_dma 27. Sep 5 Hans Petter Selasky Re: bus_get_dma_tag now necessary for drivers using bus_dma 28. Sep 5 M. Warner Losh Re: bus_get_dma_tag now necessary for drivers using bus_dma 29. Sep 5 Scott Long Re: bus_get_dma_tag now necessary for drivers using bus_dma 30. Sep 5 mami@nyitolap.hu Re: Improvements to gvinum and it's future 31. Sep 5 mjacob@freebsd.org Re: bus_get_dma_tag now necessary for drivers using bus_dma 32. Sep 5 Poul-Henning Kamp Re: bus_get_dma_tag now necessary for drivers using bus_dma 33. Sep 5 John-Mark Gurney bus_get_dma_tag now necessary for drivers using bus_dma 34. Sep 4 Marc G. Fournier Re: BSDStats - What is involved ... ? 35. Sep 4 mhofhfta dqwudbohc here's a winer SBNS 36. Sep 3 Alexander Leidinger Re: Improvements to gvinum and it's future 37. Sep 3 Alexander Leidinger Re: Improvements to gvinum and it's future


home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date