Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 12:36:10 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> To: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Udo Erdelhoff <ue@nathan.ruhr.de>, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 5.0 release docs (was Re: HEADSUP: doc/ tree tagging) Message-ID: <20030112103609.GC371@straylight.oblivion.bg> In-Reply-To: <200301111736.h0BHaxph047160@intruder.bmah.org> References: <200301100535.h0A5Zqn3023272@intruder.bmah.org> <20030110124620.GB91718@nathan.ruhr.de> <200301101643.h0AGh3cO028415@intruder.bmah.org> <200301102123.h0ALNFIf031693@intruder.bmah.org> <20030110221508.GE91718@nathan.ruhr.de> <200301110435.h0B4Zbx5038652@intruder.bmah.org> <20030111172153.GA375@straylight.oblivion.bg> <200301111736.h0BHaxph047160@intruder.bmah.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 09:36:59AM -0800, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > If memory serves me right, Peter Pentchev wrote: >=20 > > BTW, what happened to the idea of adding 'id' attributes to all > > top-level sections in the books and articles, so there are no x3388.html > > files on the website? A patch was floating around; I could take a look > > at updating it tomorrow if nobody minds. IMHO, it would be a good thing > > to have all our documentation in sensibly-named HTML files... >=20 > Hey Peter-- >=20 > Yes, this would be a good idea. I kind of wonder whether we should hold > off committing it until after 5.0 (tagging, translations, you know) but > I'd definitely like to see it happen sometime soon. Other thoughts? Actually, I think it would be best to do it before 5.0, if possible. As people pointed out in the thread with the patch, having real names on the HTML files holding the sections helps a lot WRT search engines: it is much less likely that the search engine would cache a link to outdated information in a file that is never updated because its name changes, because it is much less likely that the file's name would change :) Still, I realize that I may have lingered a bit too much in looking into this and pushing for this change. I will send a patch later today, and then we can see if it is reasonable to include it into the 5.0 release. G'luck, Peter --=20 Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 because I didn't think of a good beginning of it. --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+IUUZ7Ri2jRYZRVMRAvG+AKCNHU9e/o4vmndB/MSUlQQWZYzCIACeJliw CT29Cc4NWBEtbDADKKeexcI= =NeK3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030112103609.GC371>