Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 02:21:48 -0800 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@online.fr> Cc: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org>, Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bystander shot by a spam filter Message-ID: <3E18073C.68182FE4@mindspring.com> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20030104201251.029387d0@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030104112015.026a5530@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030104201251.029387d0@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030104202908.03c3b100@localhost> <20030105073804.GA72674@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20030105074923.GA4956@papagena.rockefeller.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Rahul Siddharthan wrote: > According to the benchmarks I cited earlier, > http://www.coyotegulch.com/reviews/intel_comp/intel_gcc_bench2.html > (look at the SciMark benchmark) > gcc actually beats intel on the sparse matrix multiply on the > Pentium IV (which generally emerges as Intel's strong platform) and > runs it pretty close on LU decomposition. That's about the only place that g++ beat Intel C++; almost all other cases, the Intel averages 20% faster, and that number goes up to 100% faster for some benchmarks on the P4. I guess people should read the referenced page, instead of trusting summaries in mailing list postings. ;^). -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3E18073C.68182FE4>