Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:29:55 -0700 From: "Steve Franks" <stevefranks@ieee.org> To: "FreeBSD Mailing List" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: kqemu runs 2x faster on i386 than amd64!? Message-ID: <539c60b90810301129x58a6e5des56c062ecbb262663@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <539c60b90810301128j2493c4c1wc9519a6fef834490@mail.gmail.com> References: <539c60b90810301128j2493c4c1wc9519a6fef834490@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Guess I should've mentioned the target is 32-bit win2k... On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Steve Franks <stevefranks@ieee.org> wrote: > I'm not comparing apples-to-apples exactly, but both my disks are in > the same system, both are running 7-stable from within the last few > months, so it's pretty close. Also, the i386 is a direct replacement > of the amd64 to fix this and other problems, so the software & > settings set is pretty identical also... > > kqemu crawls when I boot amd64 (and I notice the processor is always > over 50%), and it's reasonalbly usable on i386 (also, the processor is > often in the 30% range, instead of 60%). > > Steve >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?539c60b90810301129x58a6e5des56c062ecbb262663>