Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 18 Apr 1997 21:22:03 +0300 (EEST)
From:      Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee>
To:        dennis <dennis@etinc.com>
Cc:        Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Price of FreeBSD (was On Holy Wars...) 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.95.970418210922.22149A-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee>
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19970418121536.00b52b60@etinc.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Fri, 18 Apr 1997, dennis wrote:

> At 09:22 AM 4/18/97 -0600, Nate Williams wrote:
> >> Why is this "annoucement" such a big secret? Are you just not sure
> >> yet? You complain about no commercial vendors not being interested in
> >> FreeBSD, and then you give us this horsecrap about "wait 90 days for
> >> the big unveiling..."
> >
> >You've obviously never dealt with other commercial vendors before.
> >Right now as we speak my company is waiting with baited breath for two
> >companies (Symantec and IONA) to release their next products, which are
> >*critical* to our future success, since the # of bugs and missing
> >features in the current crop make it useless for long-term success.  All
> >attempts to let us know *IF* our bugs are fixed, whether or not new
> >features that exist in other vendors products, and anything that will
> >help us to make decisions are not told.
> >
> >This is *common* with all organizations, at least with FreeBSD you get
> >*hints* as to what's coming down the pike by looking at commit messages,
> >with commercial companies you cross your fingers and hope for the best.
> 
> Freebsd is *not* a commercial company and there is no benefit to secrecy.
> Why does a "free" OS have secrets? And this is not about fixing bugs,
> believe me I understand about bugs, its about having to reengineer
> freebsd based systems every couple of months.....

Well, a free OS may not have sectrets (besides those you can find out
about in the source) but those participating in developing it, especially
different commercial bodies do have secrets.

Just speculating: if some company (be it BSDI, Digital, the
little green aliens from the Mars or somebody wholly different) wants to
contribute something to FreeBSD, yet have it not be known to the larger
publicity (to avoid rumors, out of time queries, etc.) before it is ready
they certainly should have the right. 

The same holds true if somebody is working on a commercial, obj linkable
SMP support for FreeBSD.

	Sander

NB! I talk only for myself and anything presented above is to the best of
my knowledge only speculation - especialy the part about the aliens :-)

> 
> I'm just getting tired of getting hit in the nuts for not supporting
> -current....the fact that the release is out of date a week after its
> out is a very bad thing and really needs to change...
> 
> Dennis
> 
> 




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.970418210922.22149A-100000>