Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)


2010/freebsd-stable/20100801.freebsd-stable

Messages: 64, new messages first
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:24:32 2023

home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
  1. Jul 31 =?KOI8-R?Q?=ED=C1=CB=C1=D2 Atheros AR2427 in FreeBSD 8.1
  2. Jul 31 Peter Jeremy               Re: 8.x grudges
  3. Jul 30 Mark Lokowich              resolver refresh
  4. Jul 30 pluknet                    umount -f <nfs> forces to panic
  5. Jul 29 Sean Bruno                 Re: Unable to install 8.x on a PowerEdge R810
  6. Jul 29 Sean Bruno                 Re: Unable to install 8.x on a PowerEdge R810
  7. Jul 29 Troye Johnson              Re: 8.1 stable ar9285 ath0 problem
  8. Jul 29 Oliver Fromme              Re: 8.x grudges
  9. Jul 29 Alexandre L.               Re : ath(4) hostap with fake MAC/BSSID results in station dropping packets when associated
 10. Jul 29 Kurt Jaeger                Re: 8.1 stable ar9285 ath0 problem
 11. Jul 29 Troye Johnson              Re: Atheros AR9280 on 8.1-RC2 - unusable
 12. Jul 29 Troye Johnson              Re: 8.1 stable ar9285 ath0 problem
 13. Jul 29 Troye Johnson              Re: 8.1 stable ar9285 ath0 problem
 14. Jul 28 Martin                     ath(4) hostap with fake MAC/BSSID results in station dropping packets when associated
 15. Jul 28 Stefan Lambrev             Re: 8.x grudges
 16. Jul 28 Nenhum_de_Nos              Re: possible regression - rum ap problem under 8.1R
 17. Jul 28 Nenhum_de_Nos              Re: possible regression - rum ap problem under 8.1R
 18. Jul 28 Mikhail T.                 Re: 8.x grudges
 19. Jul 28 Kostik Belousov            Re: SIGEPIPE after update to 8.1-RC2
 20. Jul 28 Mike Tancsa                zfs boot issue with and without AHCI


21. Jul 28 Michael Proto Re: possible regression - rum ap problem under 8.1R 22. Jul 28 FreeBSD Tinderbox [releng_8_0 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 23. Jul 28 Lev Serebryakov Re: PCI AP card recommendations 24. Jul 27 Nenhum_de_Nos possible regression - rum ap problem under 8.1R 25. Jul 27 Troye Johnson 8.1 stable ar9285 ath0 problem 26. Jul 27 Clue Barnard An extra income that works 27. Jul 27 Robert Re: PCI AP card recommendations 28. Jul 27 Joshua Boyd Re: PCI AP card recommendations 29. Jul 27 John Nielsen Re: PCI AP card recommendations 30. Jul 27 Harald Schmalzbauer Re: e1000 patchset for 8.1-release [Was: em(4) duplex problems with 82541EI on RELENG_8, -CURRENT on PowerEdge 1850] 31. Jul 27 Vrachnis Ilias-Dimitrios nfsv4 strangeness 32. Jul 26 Harald Schmalzbauer Re: em(4) duplex problems with 82541EI on RELENG_8, -CURRENT on PowerEdge 1850 33. Jul 26 Stefan Esser Re: gpart -b 34 versus gpart -b 1024 34. Jul 26 Brian A. Seklecki (CFI NOC Re: em(4) duplex problems with 82541EI on RELENG_8, -CURRENT on PowerEdge 1850 35. Jul 26 Ivan Voras Re: gpart -b 34 versus gpart -b 1024 36. Jul 26 alexs@ulgsm.ru Re: Confirm your prize 37. Jul 26 perryh@pluto.rain.com Re: gpart -b 34 versus gpart -b 1024 38. Jul 25 FreeBSD Tinderbox [releng_8_1 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 39. Jul 25 Dan Langille Re: zpool destroy causes panic 40. Jul 25 Beach Geek PCI AP card recommendations
41. Jul 25 Volodymyr Kostyrko Re: zpool destroy causes panic 42. Jul 25 Dan Langille Re: zpool destroy causes panic 43. Jul 25 Dan Langille Re: zpool destroy causes panic 44. Jul 25 Volodymyr Kostyrko Re: zpool destroy causes panic 45. Jul 25 Volodymyr Kostyrko Re: zpool destroy causes panic 46. Jul 25 Beach Geek PCI access point card 47. Jul 25 Dan Langille Re: zpool destroy causes panic 48. Jul 25 Volodymyr Kostyrko Re: zpool destroy causes panic 49. Jul 25 Jeremy Chadwick Re: zpool destroy causes panic 50. Jul 25 Dan Langille Re: zpool destroy causes panic 51. Jul 25 Dan Langille zpool destroy causes panic 52. Jul 25 Chip Camden Re: no updates? 53. Jul 25 Sandra Blaze Confirm your prize 54. Jul 25 Jeremy Chadwick Re: no updates? 55. Jul 25 Beach Geek Re: no updates? 56. Jul 25 Beach Geek Re: no updates? 57. Jul 25 Jilles Tjoelker Re: SIGEPIPE after update to 8.1-RC2 58. Jul 25 Dmitry Morozovsky Re: gpart -b 34 versus gpart -b 1024 59. Jul 25 Adam Vande More Re: gpart -b 34 versus gpart -b 1024 60. Jul 25 Edho P Arief Re: gpart -b 34 versus gpart -b 1024
61. Jul 25 Adam Vande More Re: gpart -b 34 versus gpart -b 1024 62. Jul 25 Dan Langille Re: gpart -b 34 versus gpart -b 1024 63. Jul 25 Dan Langille Re: gpart -b 34 versus gpart -b 1024 64. Jul 25 Dan Langille gpart -b 34 versus gpart -b 1024


home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date