2012/freebsd-current/20120826.freebsd-current
Messages: 242, sorted by subject
|
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:16:36 2023
|
|
home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
1. Aug 20 FreeBSD Tinderbox [head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 2. Aug 20 Adrian Chadd Re: [head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 3. Aug 20 FreeBSD Tinderbox [head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 4. Aug 20 FreeBSD Tinderbox [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm 5. Aug 20 FreeBSD Tinderbox [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm 6. Aug 20 Adrian Chadd Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm 7. Aug 20 FreeBSD Tinderbox [head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386 8. Aug 20 FreeBSD Tinderbox [head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386 9. Aug 20 FreeBSD Tinderbox [head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98 10. Aug 20 FreeBSD Tinderbox [head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98 11. Aug 20 FreeBSD Tinderbox [head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64 12. Aug 20 FreeBSD Tinderbox [head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64 13. Aug 20 FreeBSD Tinderbox [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc 14. Aug 20 FreeBSD Tinderbox [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc 15. Aug 20 FreeBSD Tinderbox [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc 16. Aug 25 FreeBSD Tinderbox [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc 17. Aug 20 FreeBSD Tinderbox [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc 18. Aug 20 FreeBSD Tinderbox [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc 19. Aug 25 FreeBSD Tinderbox [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc 20. Aug 20 FreeBSD Tinderbox [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
21. Aug 20 FreeBSD Tinderbox [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 22. Aug 20 Simon L. B. Nielsen [HEADSUP] geli(4) weak master key generation on -CURRENT 23. Aug 21 Ulrich =?utf-8?B?U3DDtnJsZ Re: [HEADSUP] geli(4) weak master key generation on -CURRENT 24. Aug 24 Simon L. B. Nielsen Re: [HEADSUP] geli(4) weak master key generation on -CURRENT 25. Aug 25 Fabian Keil Re: [HEADSUP] geli(4) weak master key generation on -CURRENT 26. Aug 20 John Baldwin Re: BUFSIZ = 1024, still ? 27. Aug 20 John Baldwin Re: BUFSIZ = 1024, still ? 28. Aug 20 Matthew Jacob Re: BUFSIZ = 1024, still ? 29. Aug 21 Scott Long Re: BUFSIZ = 1024, still ? 30. Aug 21 Matthew Jacob Re: BUFSIZ = 1024, still ? 31. Aug 21 Andriy Gapon Re: BUFSIZ = 1024, still ? 32. Aug 24 Dima Panov build error at rpc code 33. Aug 24 Dimitry Andric Re: build error at rpc code 34. Aug 24 Dima Panov Re: build error at rpc code 35. Aug 24 Dimitry Andric Re: build error at rpc code 36. Aug 19 Randy Bush buildworld c++ internal error 37. Aug 19 Ryan Stone Re: buildworld c++ internal error 38. Aug 19 Randy Bush Re: buildworld c++ internal error 39. Aug 19 Ryan Stone Re: buildworld c++ internal error 40. Aug 19 Michael Butler Re: buildworld c++ internal error
41. Aug 19 Garrett Cooper Re: buildworld c++ internal error 42. Aug 19 Randy Bush Re: buildworld c++ internal error 43. Aug 20 Peter Jeremy Re: buildworld c++ internal error 44. Aug 20 Randy Bush Re: buildworld c++ internal error 45. Aug 21 Michael Butler Re: buildworld c++ internal error 46. Aug 21 Dimitry Andric Re: buildworld c++ internal error 47. Aug 20 Doug Barton Re: CURRENT as gateway on not-so-fast hardware: where is a bottlneck? 48. Aug 20 Alexander Motin Re: CURRENT as gateway on not-so-fast hardware: where is a bottlneck? 49. Aug 20 Doug Barton Re: CURRENT as gateway on not-so-fast hardware: where is a bottlneck? 50. Aug 20 Alexander Motin Re: CURRENT as gateway on not-so-fast hardware: where is a bottlneck? 51. Aug 20 Doug Barton Re: CURRENT as gateway on not-so-fast hardware: where is a bottlneck? 52. Aug 21 Florian Smeets Re: CURRENT as gateway on not-so-fast hardware: where is a bottlneck? 53. Aug 21 Vitalij Satanivskij dhclient cause up/down cycle after 239356 ? 54. Aug 21 Garrett Cooper Re: dhclient cause up/down cycle after 239356 ? 55. Aug 21 Vitalij Satanivskij Re: dhclient cause up/down cycle after 239356 ? 56. Aug 21 Peter Jeremy Re: dhclient cause up/down cycle after 239356 ? 57. Aug 22 YongHyeon PYUN Re: dhclient cause up/down cycle after 239356 ? 58. Aug 22 Vitalij Satanivskij Re: dhclient cause up/down cycle after 239356 ? 59. Aug 22 John Baldwin Re: dhclient cause up/down cycle after 239356 ? 60. Aug 22 John Baldwin Re: dhclient cause up/down cycle after 239356 ?
61. Aug 23 Adrian Chadd Re: dhclient cause up/down cycle after 239356 ? 62. Aug 23 Adrian Chadd Re: dhclient cause up/down cycle after 239356 ? 63. Aug 23 Peter Jeremy Re: dhclient cause up/down cycle after 239356 ? 64. Aug 23 Warner Losh Re: dhclient cause up/down cycle after 239356 ? 65. Aug 23 YongHyeon PYUN Re: dhclient cause up/down cycle after 239356 ? 66. Aug 23 John Baldwin Re: dhclient cause up/down cycle after 239356 ? 67. Aug 23 John Baldwin Re: dhclient cause up/down cycle after 239356 ? 68. Aug 21 O. Hartmann FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r239477 doesn't compile: virtualbox-ose-kmod-4.1.18_1 is marked as broken: Does not compile on FreeBSD < 8.2. 69. Aug 22 O. Hartmann Re: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r239477 doesn't compile: virtualbox-ose-kmod-4.1.18_1 is marked as broken: Does not compile on FreeBSD < 8.2. 70. Aug 22 Chris Rees Re: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r239477 doesn't compile: virtualbox-ose-kmod-4.1.18_1 is marked as broken: Does not compile on FreeBSD < 8.2. 71. Aug 22 Chris Rees Re: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r239477 doesn't compile: virtualbox-ose-kmod-4.1.18_1 is marked as broken: Does not compile on FreeBSD < 8.2. 72. Aug 22 Garrett Cooper Re: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r239477 doesn't compile: virtualbox-ose-kmod-4.1.18_1 is marked as broken: Does not compile on FreeBSD < 8.2. 73. Aug 22 O. Hartmann Re: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r239477 doesn't compile: virtualbox-ose-kmod-4.1.18_1 is marked as broken: Does not compile on FreeBSD < 8.2. 74. Aug 22 Chris Rees Re: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r239477 doesn't compile: virtualbox-ose-kmod-4.1.18_1 is marked as broken: Does not compile on FreeBSD < 8.2. 75. Aug 22 O. Hartmann Re: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r239477 doesn't compile: virtualbox-ose-kmod-4.1.18_1 is marked as broken: Does not compile on FreeBSD < 8.2. 76. Aug 22 Garrett Cooper Re: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r239477 doesn't compile: virtualbox-ose-kmod-4.1.18_1 is marked as broken: Does not compile on FreeBSD < 8.2. 77. Aug 22 O. Hartmann Re: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r239477 doesn't compile: virtualbox-ose-kmod-4.1.18_1 is marked as broken: Does not compile on FreeBSD < 8.2. 78. Aug 22 Garrett Cooper Re: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r239477 doesn't compile: virtualbox-ose-kmod-4.1.18_1 is marked as broken: Does not compile on FreeBSD < 8.2. 79. Aug 20 David Wolfskill FreeBSD buildkernel fails @r239409 in sys/dev/ath/if_ath_tx.c 80. Aug 20 Adrian Chadd Re: FreeBSD buildkernel fails @r239409 in sys/dev/ath/if_ath_tx.c
81. Aug 19 Bjorn Larsson gptzfsboot problem on HP P410i Smart Array 82. Aug 19 Andrey V. Elsukov Re: gptzfsboot problem on HP P410i Smart Array 83. Aug 20 Bjorn Larsson Re: gptzfsboot problem on HP P410i Smart Array 84. Aug 20 John Baldwin Re: kernel page fult for a valid pointer? 85. Aug 20 Monthadar Al Jaberi Re: kernel page fult for a valid pointer? 86. Aug 20 John Baldwin Re: kernel page fult for a valid pointer? 87. Aug 22 Luigi Rizzo less aggressive contigmalloc ? 88. Aug 23 Alan Cox Re: less aggressive contigmalloc ? 89. Aug 23 Luigi Rizzo Re: less aggressive contigmalloc ? 90. Aug 23 Alan Cox Re: less aggressive contigmalloc ? 91. Aug 23 Luigi Rizzo Re: less aggressive contigmalloc ? 92. Aug 23 Warner Losh Re: less aggressive contigmalloc ? 93. Aug 24 Alan Cox Re: less aggressive contigmalloc ? 94. Aug 24 Luigi Rizzo Re: less aggressive contigmalloc ? 95. Aug 24 Alan Cox Re: less aggressive contigmalloc ? 96. Aug 24 Luigi Rizzo Re: less aggressive contigmalloc ? 97. Aug 24 Alan Cox Re: less aggressive contigmalloc ? 98. Aug 19 Tim Kientzle Re: make package fails in chroot: tar: getvfsbyname failed: No such file or directory 99. Aug 19 Tim Kientzle Re: make package fails in chroot: tar: getvfsbyname failed: No such file or directory 100. Aug 20 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bernhard_Fr Re: make package fails in chroot: tar: getvfsbyname failed: No such file or directory
101. Aug 20 Konstantin Belousov Re: make package fails in chroot: tar: getvfsbyname failed: No such file or directory 102. Aug 20 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bernhard_Fr Re: make package fails in chroot: tar: getvfsbyname failed: No such file or directory 103. Aug 25 Jeffrey Bouquet Re: One more pkg non-default-please edge-case reasoning... 104. Aug 20 O. Hartmann Re: OpenLDAP/SASL2 problem in FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT WAS: Re: HELP! core dumps: install, mtree, et cetera all of the sudden after portmaster sec 105. Aug 20 Baptiste Daroussin pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule 106. Aug 21 Ivan Voras Re: pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule 107. Aug 21 Jeremie Le Hen Re: pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule 108. Aug 21 Baptiste Daroussin Re: pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule 109. Aug 21 Doug Barton Re: pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule 110. Aug 21 Baptiste Daroussin Re: pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule 111. Aug 21 Garrett Cooper Re: pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule 112. Aug 21 Doug Barton Re: pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule 113. Aug 21 Baptiste Daroussin Re: pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule 114. Aug 21 Doug Barton Re: pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule 115. Aug 21 Baptiste Daroussin Re: pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule 116. Aug 21 Doug Barton Re: pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule 117. Aug 21 Warner Losh Re: pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule 118. Aug 21 Doug Barton Re: pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule 119. Aug 21 Garrett Cooper Re: pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule 120. Aug 22 Bjoern A. Zeeb Re: pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule
121. Aug 22 Erwin Lansing Re: pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule 122. Aug 22 Doug Barton Re: pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule 123. Aug 22 Ivan Voras Re: pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule 124. Aug 22 Warner Losh Re: pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule 125. Aug 22 Kevin Oberman Re: pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule 126. Aug 22 Baptiste Daroussin Re: pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule 127. Aug 23 Doug Barton Re: pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule 128. Aug 24 Chris Rees RE: pkgng default release schedule (contd...) 129. Aug 24 Jeffrey Bouquet RE: pkgng default release schedule (contd...) 130. Aug 23 Jeffrey Bouquet pkgng default schedule... registering a few reasons for rethinking the final implementation... 131. Aug 23 Kris Moore Re: pkgng default schedule... registering a few reasons for rethinking the final implementation... 132. Aug 23 Chris Rees Re: pkgng default schedule... registering a few reasons for rethinking the final implementation... 133. Aug 23 Jeremy Messenger Re: pkgng default schedule... registering a few reasons for rethinking the final implementation... 134. Aug 23 Julien Laffaye Re: pkgng default schedule... registering a few reasons for rethinking the final implementation... 135. Aug 23 Baptiste Daroussin Re: pkgng default schedule... registering a few reasons for rethinking the final implementation... 136. Aug 23 Kris Moore Re: pkgng default schedule... registering a few reasons for rethinking the final implementation... 137. Aug 23 Chris Rees Re: pkgng default schedule... registering a few reasons for rethinking the final implementation... 138. Aug 23 Baptiste Daroussin Re: pkgng default schedule... registering a few reasons for rethinking the final implementation... 139. Aug 23 olli hauer Re: pkgng default schedule... registering a few reasons for rethinking the final implementation... 140. Aug 23 Kris Moore Re: pkgng default schedule... registering a few reasons for rethinking the final implementation...
141. Aug 23 Adrian Chadd Re: pkgng default schedule... registering a few reasons for rethinking the final implementation... 142. Aug 23 Jilles Tjoelker Re: pkgng default schedule... registering a few reasons for rethinking the final implementation... 143. Aug 23 Steve Wills pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 144. Aug 23 Baptiste Daroussin Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 145. Aug 23 Doug Barton Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 146. Aug 23 Bryan Drewery Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 147. Aug 23 Patrick Lamaiziere Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 148. Aug 23 Alexander Kabaev Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 149. Aug 24 Eitan Adler Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 150. Aug 24 Steve Wills Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 151. Aug 24 Eitan Adler Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 152. Aug 24 Steve Wills Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 153. Aug 24 Eitan Adler Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 154. Aug 24 Steve Wills Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 155. Aug 24 Doug Barton Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 156. Aug 24 Eitan Adler Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 157. Aug 24 Eitan Adler Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 158. Aug 24 Warren Block Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 159. Aug 24 Julien Laffaye Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 160. Aug 24 Baptiste Daroussin Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap
161. Aug 24 Sergey V. Dyatko Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 162. Aug 24 Florian Smeets Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 163. Aug 24 Alex Dupre Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 164. Aug 24 Baptiste Daroussin Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 165. Aug 24 Bryan Drewery Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 166. Aug 24 Baptiste Daroussin Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 167. Aug 24 Bryan Drewery Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 168. Aug 24 Doug Barton Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 169. Aug 24 Doug Barton Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 170. Aug 25 Baptiste Daroussin Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 171. Aug 25 Glen Barber Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 172. Aug 25 Glen Barber Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 173. Aug 25 Jonathan Anderson Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 174. Aug 25 Doug Barton Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 175. Aug 25 Jonathan Anderson Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 176. Aug 25 Julien Laffaye Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 177. Aug 25 CyberLeo Kitsana Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap 178. Aug 21 Lev Serebryakov r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 179. Aug 21 Lev Serebryakov Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 180. Aug 21 Lev Serebryakov Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone?
181. Aug 21 Slawa Olhovchenkov Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 182. Aug 21 John Baldwin Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 183. Aug 21 John Baldwin Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 184. Aug 21 Lev Serebryakov Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 185. Aug 21 Lev Serebryakov Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 186. Aug 21 Ian Lepore Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 187. Aug 21 Ian Lepore Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 188. Aug 21 Lev Serebryakov Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 189. Aug 21 Lev Serebryakov Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 190. Aug 21 Ian Lepore Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 191. Aug 21 Lev Serebryakov Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 192. Aug 21 olli hauer Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 193. Aug 21 Ian Lepore Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 194. Aug 21 Lev Serebryakov Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 195. Aug 21 Lev Serebryakov Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 196. Aug 21 Slawa Olhovchenkov Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 197. Aug 21 Doug Barton Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 198. Aug 21 Doug Barton Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 199. Aug 21 Lev Serebryakov Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 200. Aug 21 Slawa Olhovchenkov Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone?
201. Aug 21 Warner Losh Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 202. Aug 21 Warner Losh Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 203. Aug 21 Warner Losh Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 204. Aug 21 Lev Serebryakov Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 205. Aug 21 Lev Serebryakov Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 206. Aug 21 Lev Serebryakov Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 207. Aug 21 John Baldwin Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 208. Aug 21 John Baldwin Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 209. Aug 21 Ian Lepore Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 210. Aug 21 Slawa Olhovchenkov Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 211. Aug 21 Lev Serebryakov Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 212. Aug 21 Lev Serebryakov Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 213. Aug 21 Lev Serebryakov Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 214. Aug 21 Slawa Olhovchenkov Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 215. Aug 21 Peter Jeremy Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 216. Aug 21 Slawa Olhovchenkov Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 217. Aug 21 Slawa Olhovchenkov Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 218. Aug 22 Warner Losh Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 219. Aug 22 Warner Losh Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 220. Aug 22 John Baldwin Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone?
221. Aug 22 John Baldwin Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 222. Aug 22 Slawa Olhovchenkov Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 223. Aug 22 Slawa Olhovchenkov Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone? 224. Aug 19 Hans Petter Selasky Recent changes in AT91 kernel code causes USB to not work [WAS: r239214 - in head/sys: dev/usb dev/usb/controller sys] 225. Aug 20 Warner Losh Re: Recent changes in AT91 kernel code causes USB to not work [WAS: r239214 - in head/sys: dev/usb dev/usb/controller sys] 226. Aug 22 David Naylor tar not working in an i386 chroot (getvfsbyname) 227. Aug 22 Konstantin Belousov Re: tar not working in an i386 chroot (getvfsbyname) 228. Aug 22 David Naylor Re: tar not working in an i386 chroot (getvfsbyname) 229. Aug 22 David Naylor Re: tar not working in an i386 chroot (getvfsbyname) 230. Aug 24 =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3 Re: Time to bump default VM_SWZONE_SIZE_MAX? 231. Aug 24 John Baldwin Re: Time to bump default VM_SWZONE_SIZE_MAX? 232. Aug 24 =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3 Re: Time to bump default VM_SWZONE_SIZE_MAX? 233. Aug 24 John Baldwin Re: Time to bump default VM_SWZONE_SIZE_MAX? 234. Aug 25 Colin Percival Re: Time to bump default VM_SWZONE_SIZE_MAX? 235. Aug 25 =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3 Re: Time to bump default VM_SWZONE_SIZE_MAX? 236. Aug 23 Luigi Rizzo TUNABLE_INT vs TUNABLE_INT_FETCH 237. Aug 23 Attilio Rao Re: TUNABLE_INT vs TUNABLE_INT_FETCH 238. Aug 23 Luigi Rizzo Re: TUNABLE_INT vs TUNABLE_INT_FETCH 239. Aug 23 Attilio Rao Re: TUNABLE_INT vs TUNABLE_INT_FETCH 240. Aug 23 Luigi Rizzo Re: TUNABLE_INT vs TUNABLE_INT_FETCH
241. Aug 23 John Baldwin Re: TUNABLE_INT vs TUNABLE_INT_FETCH 242. Aug 23 John Baldwin Re: TUNABLE_INT vs TUNABLE_INT_FETCH
home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date